Back to front page

Message from the Chair of the Board

Message from the Director General

Enhancing the role of forests in mitigating and adapting to climate change

Building momentum on the road to Copenhagen

REDD: an idea whose time has come

Forests for adaptation and adaptation for forests

Industry challenges conservationists to raise the bar

Improving livelihoods through smallholder and community forestry

Harvesting forests to reduce poverty

Making the most of Burkina Faso’s gum harvest

Sweetening the deal for Zambia’s honey industry

Shifting the balance of power

Managing trade-offs between conservation and development at the landscape scale

Co-management for co-benefits

Charting a course for collaboration

Tracking change to find a balance

Managing the impacts of globalised trade and investment of forests and forest communities

Research delivers return on investment

Tracking the proceeds of crime

Sustainably managing tropical production forests

Sustaining Cameroon’s forests

Logging for biodiversity

Reforming the bushmeat trade

Sharing Knowledge with policy makers and practitioners

Publish or perish?

Found in translation

 

Forests for adaptation and adaptation for forests

When they talk about climate change and forests, people largely think in terms of mitigation. By planting trees we can mitigate climate change by mopping up some of the atmospheric carbon. And by curbing deforestation and forest degradation, we can reduce the emissions going into the atmosphere. We have paid much less attention to forests and adaptation: devising ways through forest management to help human communities and the natural world cope with climate change.

 

Although climate change poses a significant threat to tropical forests, it is often overlooked, not least because many countries are preoccupied with more obvious threats, such as illegal logging and agricultural expansion. A new study, launched by CIFOR at the 14th UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Conference of the Parties (COP 14) in December 2008, argues that we need to pay greater attention to the impact of climate change on forests and to future adaptation strategies.

 

‘Most forest managers know relatively little about the impact of climate change, and even less about how they could adapt their forests to cope with change,’ says Bruno Locatelli, CIFOR-CIRAD scientist.

‘Most forest managers know relatively little about the impact of climate change, and even less about how they could adapt their forests to cope with change.’

 

Bruno Locatelli
CIFOR-CIRAD scientist

But it is not just forest managers who are in the dark. Adaptation is a new arena for tropical forest scientists, and tropical forests are a new arena for adaptation specialists. Facing an Uncertain Future is an essential primer for both these groups. It shows how we can help forests to weather the storm of climate change—‘adaptation for forests’; and how forest can help communities to cope better with climate change—‘forests for adaptation’. See http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/publications/pdf_files/Books/BLocatelli0801.pdf.

 

Climate change is already affecting tropical forests in some parts the world. Most obviously, changes in temperature and rainfall are leading to a greater chance of fire.

 

‘In these instances,’ says Locatelli, ‘forest managers could develop fire prevention plans to reduce risk.’

 

However, he concedes that this will generally be a costly, short-term strategy which is only likely to apply to forests that are considered of high value, either economically or for wildlife conservation.

 

Climate change is causing shifts in bio-geographical zones, and this means that some species are likely to be threatened. The authors of Facing an Uncertain Future suggest that policy makers and forest managers design strategies to help species migrate to other areas. This might involve the creation of wildlife corridors between large blocks of forest.

 

Climate change is also likely to lead to the spread of invasive species, and measures to prevent this spread or remove them might need to be established.

 

A variety of silvicultural practices could also help forests adapt to climate change, according to another CIFOR study published in 2008. For example, forest managers could increase the diversity of species and thus increase the likelihood of establishing species that will survive climate change. See ‘Mitigation needs adaptation: tropical forestry and climate change’. http://www.springerlink.com/content/1x87u71312n8j368/.

 

Then there is the other side of the coin: forests for adaptation. According to the authors of Facing an Uncertain Future, forests have the potential to help human communities cope with climate change. They suggest that we adopt conservation and management policies that reduce human vulnerability by protecting the environmental services that forests deliver.

 

‘This is a very new area of concern,’ says Locatelli, ‘and it requires not only a lot more research, but a shift in thinking among policy makers.’

 

At present, most national adaptation strategies concentrate on individual sectors, such as water, agriculture and industry, and tend to ignore the complex links among them. For example, forests play a vital role in regulating water supplies, but national adaptation strategies, where they exist, often fail to recognise these links. Yet, if forests and their surrounding landscapes are threatened, this will almost certainly have an adverse effect on water supplies, as one of the case studies in Facing an Uncertain Future illustrates.

 

Hydroelectric power production in Costa Rica is extremely vulnerable to climate change, and the authors of the case study found that the increase in the frequency of heavy rainfall had led to an increase in the rate of erosion, and thus an increase in siltation in the power generating dams. Current programmes involving payments for environmental services do not cover agriculture, and therefore fail to have a significant impact on erosion. If water supplies are to be safeguarded against climate change, policy makers need to consider new incentive schemes to reduce erosion and siltation: forestry, agriculture and water supply must be considered together, rather than as separate sectors.

 

Although most of the efforts to tackle climate change have been directed towards mitigation, the need to develop policies for adaptation is now widely acknowledged, as is the need to establish new funding mechanisms. See ‘Taxing times’ below. Facing an Uncertain Future suggests that efforts to design national adaptation policies have been largely inadequate. A lack of information, uncertainties about the impact of climate change, the political preference to concentrate on policies that bring immediate short-term gains—all have hindered the development of adaptation policies. However, research by CIFOR scientists working on the Tropical Forests and Climate Change Adaptation (TroFCCA) project has identified possible pathways for mainstreaming adaptation into policy, and it is encouraging scientists, decision makers and donors to pay greater attention to the role forests could play in adapting to climate change. See ‘Adapting to change in northern Mali

  1. Forest fruit collecting in Brazil’s tropical forest.
    Photo by Flávio Contente
  2. Transferring bags of charcoal from donkey carts to river boats in Mali.
    Photo by Daniel Tiveau
  3. Stacking fuelwood in Mali.
    Photo by Daniel Tiveau

Taxing times

The UNFCCC secretariat estimates that the money needed for adaptation could exceed US $100 billion a year for several decades. The funds currently available under the Kyoto Protocol and a range of other measures come nowhere near meeting such a large bill. In order to raise more money, an Adaptation Fund was established in 2007. Markku Kanninen, who leads CIFOR’s climate change research, is one of the alternate members on the Adaptation Fund’s board. He believes the fund, which will take 2 per cent of all the revenues raised by the carbon trade under the Clean Development Mechanism, has the potential to make a significant impact.

 

‘Most of the first year was taken up with designing the rules and regulations,’ says Kanninen, ‘but we are hoping that by the time we get to COP 15 in December 2009, the first tranche of projects will have been financed.’

 

Adapting to change in northern Mali

In northern Mali, droughts and famines have occurred throughout history, and the local people are used to hardship. This may explain why they have adapted with some success to the changing climate over recent years. However, the political and administrative systems in the country lag behind, and have yet to adapt their planning and development policies to climate change. This is one of the findings of a study conducted under the TroFCCA project. See http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/publications/pdf_files/Infobrief/019-infobrief.pdf.

 

The study looked at how local communities were adapting to climate change in two villages to the north of Lake Faguibine, near Timbuktu. At one time, the local economies flourished: fish were plentiful and local people cultivated wheat and barley on the rich soil surrounding the lake. But in the 1970s and 1980s, droughts became more frequent, and rainfall less plentiful. Now, over a quarter of the area that was formerly under water is covered by an indigenous tree, Acacia, and an introduced species, Prosopis. A development project established the latter in the 1980s to protect the lake shore from the effects of drought. Prosopis trees have spread across a wider area than Acacia trees have.

 

The researchers undertook fieldwork between July and October 2008. They began by conducting a 10-day biophysical survey, during which they explained to local people precisely what they hoped to achieve. The survey was followed by a series of workshops to establish how the villagers had adapted, or failed to adapt, to the changing climate and environment.

 

‘At first,’ says CIFOR scientist Maria Brockhaus, ‘they were telling us what a nightmare the Prosopis forest was.’

 

Some complained that it was so dense they would lose their animals there—and possibly their lives. Others said that the species had taken over land once used for cultivation and fisheries. However, a dissenting view began to emerge. Some of the villagers pointed out that during the recent drought their animals had only been able to survive because of the fodder provided by Prosopis; others said that they had used the timber to make charcoal.

 

‘Then they began to laugh and assess what they’d been saying,’ says Brockhaus.
‘They realised they were always complaining about the Prosopis, but they had actually identified more benefits than disadvantages. What’s more, they had successfully adapted to the changing environment.’

 

The same could not be said for either local or central governments. Brockhaus and her colleague Houria Djoudi discovered that a planned development project, designed to cut new water channels around the fringes of Lake Faguibine, could have a profound influence on the environment, yet the plans at the time of research did not take into account the ways in which local people and the ecosystem had already adapted to climate change. There were no plans to manage the local resources sustainably, neither could the researchers identify any technical support from government bodies. In short, the adaptation efforts of the local population seemed to be entirely disconnected from higher-scale planning and decision making.

 

‘This is a good illustration of why it is so important to mainstream adaptation into national policy making,’ says Brockhaus.

‘This is a good illustration of why it is so important to mainstream adaptation into national policy making.’

 

Maria Brockhaus
CIFOR scientist

 

 

The village of Teli in Mali.
Photo by Daniel Tiveau

A brush fire in Mali.
Photo by Christian Cossalter