A ciência precisa de canais de comunicação claros para cortar o ruído, para que a pesquisa tenha algum impacto. O CIFOR-ICRAF é tão apaixonado por compartilhar nosso conhecimento quanto por gerá-lo.
Découvrez les évènements passés et à venir dans le monde entier et en ligne, qu’ils soient organisés par le CIFOR-ICRAF ou auxquels participent nos chercheurs.
Jelajahi acara-acara mendatang dan yang telah lalu di lintas global dan daring, baik itu diselenggarakan oleh CIFOR-ICRAF atau dihadiri para peneliti kami.
Pour que la recherche ait un impact, la science a besoin de canaux de communication clairs pour aller droit au but. CIFOR-ICRAF est aussi passionné par le partage de ses connaissances que par leur production.
Para que la investigación pueda generar algún impacto, los conocimientos científicos requieren de canales de comunicación claros. En CIFOR-ICRAF, compartir nuestros conocimientos nos apasiona tanto como generarlos.
Ilmu pengetahuan membutuhkan saluran komunikasi yang jelas untuk mencapai tujuan, jika ingin dampaknya terlihat. CIFOR-ICRAF sangat bersemangat untuk berbagi pengetahuan sembari menghasilkan pengetahuan itu sendiri.
CIFOR–ICRAF achieves science-driven impact. We conduct innovative research, strengthen
partners’ capacity and actively engage in dialogue with all stakeholders, bringing the latest insights on
forests, trees, landscapes and people to global decision making.
CIFOR–ICRAF publishes over 750 publications every year on agroforestry, forests and climate change, landscape restoration, rights, forest policy and much more – in multiple languages.
Explore our knowledge
Browse CIFOR–ICRAF’s published research in a wide range of formats, all of which are available for free online.
Science needs clear communication channels to cut through the noise, if research is to have any impact. CIFOR-ICRAF is as passionate about sharing our knowledge as we are in generating it.
CIFOR–ICRAF addresses local challenges and opportunities while providing solutions to global problems for forests,
landscapes, people and the planet.
We deliver actionable evidence and solutions to transform how land is used and how food is produced: conserving and
restoring ecosystems, responding to the global climate, malnutrition, biodiversity and desertification crises. In short,
improving people’s lives.
This handbook explains how to implement How are we doing?, a tool that
enables participatory reflective monitoring in multi-stakeholder forums (MSFs).
MSFs are spaces that include a wide range of stakeholders in a topic or
region, to engage in dialogue, decision making and/or the implementation of
activities for common landscape goals. How are we doing? supports enabling
conditions to allow the MSF to achieve its goal(s) equitably and effectively.
Here we provide a step-by-step process on how to do that.
MSFs have gained much attention around the world because of their potential
to improve collaboration between different actors, sectors and governance
levels to address complex challenges, which cannot be resolved by one actor
alone. They can also include actors that, throughout history, have not been
able (or allowed) to participate in decision making on land use and land-use
issues and/or the design of initiatives that may affect their rights, territories,
lives and livelihoods.
This handbook is the product of collaboration between members of MSFs and
researchers from the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). The
collaboration emerged from the identification of the need for a simple tool to
allow MSF participants to monitor their forums, and reflect upon and improve
their processes and results. In response, CIFOR held a series of participatory
workshops in Indonesia and Peru to develop How are we doing?, to reflect on
and learn from what the MSF has been doing well (and not so well); examine
progress toward the objective(s), including the challenges faced and the ones
still ahead; and support the annual planning process.
How are we doing? has three main features that set it apart from other tools.
First, it was developed together with members of several subnational MSFs.
Second, it was designed to be used by MSF participants themselves, not to be
applied by external evaluators. And, third, its objective goes beyond a simple
assessment of indicators, rather inviting participants to discuss and reflect on
their answers. The purpose of this reflection is to learn from the past, consider
progress and obstacles to further progress, and collectively plan how to
achieve the MSF’s goals in the future.