Home › › › Results-based payment: Who should be paid, and for what?

Results-based payment: Who should be paid, and for what?

Export citation

Endnote
RIS

Key messages

Results-based payment (RBP), the main innovation brought by REDD+, has also been the most challenging to implement. Three key challenges for RBP are: what to pay for, how to set reference levels, and whom to pay; these challenges are at risk of biases, including a ‘cherry picking’ of numbers.
Current and emerging RBP initiatives are hybrid approaches. As such, they make compromises on key RBP principles, such as payment based solely on results, recipient discretion (on how to achieve results) and independent verification of results.
Minimising these risks requires learning from previous experiences to develop a clear rule book for the Paris Agreement, as well as institutional checks and balances. Managing these risks would help preserve the effectiveness (environmental integrity) and efficiency of RBP in REDD+, and thus its longterm political credibility and financing.

Download:

English-Full (0.5 MB)

Publication year

2018

Authors

Angelsen, A.; Hermansen, E.A.T.; Rajão, R.; van der Hoff, R.

Language

English

Keywords

climate change, ecosystem services, mitigation, emissions, forests

Related publications

Browse all

REDD+ : la transformation: Enseignements et nouvelles directions

Transforming REDD+: Lessons and new directions

Introduction: REDD+ enters its second decade

Pathway to impact: Is REDD+ a viable theory of change?

For general inquiries

The Center for International Forestry Research and World Agroforestry (CIFOR-ICRAF) harnesses the power of trees, forests and agroforestry landscapes to address the most pressing global challenges of our time – biodiversity loss, climate change, food security, livelihoods and inequity. CIFOR and ICRAF are CGIAR Research Centers.

For general inquiries:

For media inquiries contact:

Content

Research

GLOBAL OFFICES