CIFOR–ICRAF publishes over 750 publications every year on agroforestry, forests and climate change, landscape restoration, rights, forest policy and much more – in multiple languages.

CIFOR–ICRAF addresses local challenges and opportunities while providing solutions to global problems for forests, landscapes, people and the planet.

We deliver actionable evidence and solutions to transform how land is used and how food is produced: conserving and restoring ecosystems, responding to the global climate, malnutrition, biodiversity and desertification crises. In short, improving people’s lives.

Re-greening the Bare-hills through Community-managed Forests in Nepal: Can Biodiversity Conservation and Livelihoods go together across the Landscape?

Export citation

In recent years, the importance of biodiversity to economies, human welfare and survival has been widely recognised and millions of people worldwide actively support biodiversity conservation. Community-based Forest Management (CFM) has become a globally popular approach to forest management, and has been considered a successful national strategy to conserve biodiversity and to improve rural livelihood in Nepal. Based on literature review, discussions with key informants and observations in several community-managed forests, this paper aims to explore contributions of CFM in livelihoods and biodiversity conservation over three decades. Initial results suggest that CFM has resulted in a substantial restoration of forests on degraded lands and vegetation in bare hills. The result of changing land use and land cover in community-managed forested landscapes provides livelihood opportunities to local communities in various ways. Similarly, many studies indicate that a significant number of wild animal and plant species have been reappearing in community-managed forests. Providing refuge to hundreds of wild animals and plant species, biodiversity conservation in community-managed forests provides benefits to local national and global communities. Although established and traditional livelihoods and approaches to biodiversity conservation have often conflicted, this research concludes that CFM can integrate livelihoods and biodiversity in the same landscape, although there are some trade-offs between rural sustainability and biodiversity to achieve the best possible CFM outcome.

Related publications