Scientists and policy-makers globally are calling for alternative approaches to conventional intensification of agriculture that enhance ecosystem services provided by biodiversity. The evidence reviewed here suggests that alternative approaches can achieve high crop yields and profits, but the performance of other socioeconomic indicators (as well as long-term trends) is surprisingly poorly documented. Consequently, the implementation of conventional intensification and the discussion of alternative approaches are not based on quantitative evidence of their simultaneous ecological and socioeconomic impacts across the globe. To close this knowledge gap, we propose a participatory assessment framework. Given the impacts of conventional intensification on biodiversity loss and greenhouse gas emissions, such evidence is urgently needed to direct science-policy initiatives, such as the United Nations (UN) 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.001Altmetric score:
Dimensions Citation Count:
Publication year
2017
Authors
Garibaldi L A; Gemmill-Herren, B.; D'Annolfo R; Graeub B; Cunningham S A; Breeze T D
Language
English
Keywords
agroecology, valuation, ecosystem services, sustainable development, biodiversity
