CIFOR–ICRAF publishes over 750 publications every year on agroforestry, forests and climate change, landscape restoration, rights, forest policy and much more – in multiple languages.

CIFOR–ICRAF addresses local challenges and opportunities while providing solutions to global problems for forests, landscapes, people and the planet.

We deliver actionable evidence and solutions to transform how land is used and how food is produced: conserving and restoring ecosystems, responding to the global climate, malnutrition, biodiversity and desertification crises. In short, improving people’s lives.

Mid-Infrared and Total X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy Complementarity for Assessment of Soil Properties

Export citation

Diffuse reflectance Fourier transformed mid-infrared (DRIFT-MIR) spectroscopy can predict many soil properties but extractable nutrients are often predicted poorly. This paper tested the combined DRIFT-MIR and total X-ray fluores-cence (TXRF) spectroscopy analysis for prediction of soil properties related to soil fertility. A total of 700 soil samples from 44 stratified randomly located 100-km2 sentinel sites distributed across Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) were ana-lyzed for physicochemical composition using conventional reference methods, and compared with MIR and TXRF spectra using Random Forests (RF) regression algorithm and an internal out-of-bag (OOB) validation. Mid-infrared spectra resulted in good prediction models (R2 > 0.80) for organic C and total N, Mehlich-3 Ca and Al, and pH. Moderately predicted (R 2 > 0.60) were extractable Mg, P sorption index, sand, silt, and clay. Models were less satis-factory (R 2 < 0.60) for Mehlich-3 extractable K, Mn, Fe, Cu, B, Zn, P, S, and Na, exchangeable acidity and electrical conductivity (Ecd). Inclusion of total element concentration data from TXRF analysis in the MIR RF models signifi-cantly reduced root mean square error of prediction by 70% for Ecd, 66% for Mehlich-3 Na, 61% for Mehlich-3 S, and 50% for Mehlich-3 B due to detection by TXRF of some saline soils that were not well predicted by MIR. Overall, both methods predicted soil properties that relate to nutrient buffering capac-ity, including some exchangeable bases, pH, P sorption capacity, clay content, and organic matter content, and fingerprint basic soil mineralogy. Thus, further research should test whether MIR and TXRF fingerprinting could better predict soil nutrient supply capacity, as determined by crop nutrient uptake potential, than conventional soil P, K and micronutrient tests

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2014.11.0458
Altmetric score:
Dimensions Citation Count:

Related publications