CIFOR–ICRAF publishes over 750 publications every year on agroforestry, forests and climate change, landscape restoration, rights, forest policy and much more – in multiple languages.

CIFOR–ICRAF addresses local challenges and opportunities while providing solutions to global problems for forests, landscapes, people and the planet.

We deliver actionable evidence and solutions to transform how land is used and how food is produced: conserving and restoring ecosystems, responding to the global climate, malnutrition, biodiversity and desertification crises. In short, improving people’s lives.

Tolerance to acid soil conditions of the velvet beans Mucuna pruriens var. utilis and M. deeringiana I. Root development

Export citation

Velvet beans, fast growing leguminous cover crops used in the humid tropics, are shallow rooted on acid soils. This might be due to an inherent branching pattern, to an intrinsic toxicity of the acid subsoil or to a relative preference for root development in the topsoil. Such preference could be based on soil chemical factors in the subsoil or on physical factors such as penetration resistance or aeration. In a field experiment with two species of velvet bean (Mucuna pruriens var. utilis and M. deeringiana) all topsoil was removed and plants were sown directly into the acid subsoil. Root development was neither affected by this treatment nor by P fertilization or liming. In the absence of topsoil good root development in the exposed upper layer of subsoil was possible, so the hypothesis of a toxicity per se of the subsoil could be rejected. To test whether poor root development in the subsoil in the presence of topsoil is due to an inherent branching pattern of the plant or to a relative preference for topsoil, a modified in-growth core technique was used. Local topsoil and subsoil and an acid soil with a higher exchangeable Al content were placed in mesh bags at different depths and at different bulk densities, with and without lime and/or P fertilizer. A comparison of root development in mesh bags placed in the topsoil or subsoil showed that position and thus inherent branching pattern is not important. Root development in the subsoil was poor when this soil was placed in a mesh bag in the topsoil, but in an acid soil of much higher exchangeable Al content and higher percentage Al saturation more roots developed. In a second experiment in mesh bags, bulk density of the repacked soil in the range 1.0–1.5 g cm-3 had no significant effect on root development. P fertilization and a high rate of liming of the soil placed in the mesh bag had a positive effect on root length density. It is concluded that poor root development in the acid subsoil under field conditions is due to a relative preference for topsoil. Al saturation and bulk density of the soil are not directly involved in this preference, but differences in availability of P and Mg or in Ca/Al ratios might play a role.

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00010721
Altmetric score:
Dimensions Citation Count:

Related publications