CIFOR–ICRAF publishes over 750 publications every year on agroforestry, forests and climate change, landscape restoration, rights, forest policy and much more – in multiple languages.

CIFOR–ICRAF addresses local challenges and opportunities while providing solutions to global problems for forests, landscapes, people and the planet.

We deliver actionable evidence and solutions to transform how land is used and how food is produced: conserving and restoring ecosystems, responding to the global climate, malnutrition, biodiversity and desertification crises. In short, improving people’s lives.

Potential impact of agroforestry on soil nutrient budgets at the farm scale in the East African highlands

Export citation

There is much current interest in the potential role of agroforestry in the mitigation of nutrient depletion in Sub-Saharan Africa. Using data from farm surveys and trials, a static model of N and P flows was constructed for a standard farm system, representative of typical subsistence farms in humid parts of the East African Highlands. The model was used to explore the possible impact of improved agroforestry systems on nutrient budgets, to identify priorities for research. Soil nutrient balances in the standard farm system were - 107 kg N and - 8 kg P ha1 yr1. Agroforestry systems did not significantly reduce the N deficits except when a high proportion of the total biomass was returned to the soil, rather than removed from the farm. Agroforestry increased N input through biological N fixation and deep N uptake, but this was offset by a larger nutrient removal from the farm in harvested products, which increased from 38 kg N in the standard system to 169 kg N ha1 yr1 in an intensive dairy-agroforestry system. Agroforestry did not increase P inputs, and harvested P increased from 6 kg P in the standard farm system to 29 kg P ha1 yr1 in the dairy-agroforestry system. Thus, moderate P inputs, of 20 kg P ha1 yr1 were required to maintain soil P stocks. N leaching from the field was the most significant nutrient loss from the farm system, with a range of 68 to 139 kg N ha1 yr1. The capture of subsoil N by deep-rooted trees in agroforestry systems substantially increased N-use efficiency, providing 60 kg N ha1 yr1 in the dairy-agroforestry system. The budgets were sensitive to N mineralization rates in subsoils, N losses from soils and manures, and effectiveness of deep-rooted plants in subsoil N capture, for which there is little data from the region. Therefore, high priority should be given to research in these areas. The current model can not account for important feedback mechanisms that would allow analysis of the long-term effects of nutrient budgets on nutrient availability and plant productivity. Dynamic models of farm nutrient budgets that include such interactions are needed to further assess the sustainability of farming systems

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00750797
Altmetric score:
Dimensions Citation Count:

    Publication year

    1996

    Authors

    Ohlsson E L; Okalebo J R; Ndufa J K; Shepherd K D

    Language

    English

    Keywords

    fertilizers, highlands, manures (fertilizers), soil nutrient content, soil nutrient, agroforestry systems

    Geographic

    Kenya

Related publications