CIFOR–ICRAF publishes over 750 publications every year on agroforestry, forests and climate change, landscape restoration, rights, forest policy and much more – in multiple languages.

CIFOR–ICRAF addresses local challenges and opportunities while providing solutions to global problems for forests, landscapes, people and the planet.

We deliver actionable evidence and solutions to transform how land is used and how food is produced: conserving and restoring ecosystems, responding to the global climate, malnutrition, biodiversity and desertification crises. In short, improving people’s lives.

Pine needle consumption and bark stripping by sheep grazing annual pastures in young stands of widely spaced Pinus radiata and ppinaster.

Export citation

The consumption of the pine needles and the stripping of bark by sheep grazing annual pastures in three open stands of P. radiata and one of P. pinaster were measured. The P. radiata were four years old and the densities were 250, 500 and 750 trees ha-1. The P. pinaster included two, three and four year-old trees and the density was 440 trees ha1. Needles were eaten immediately after the sheep were admitted and this continued throughout the year. Within ten weeks of the start of winter grazing, sheep stocked at 7–10 ha1 had eaten about half of the accessible needles on both species where densities were less than500 trees ha1. The estimated consumption was about 260 g sheep1 day1 for the P. radiata. Bark stripping then commenced and continued throughout spring and summer on most plots. In some plots at low tree density, bark was stripped from more than 35% of the trees. In denser stands, needle consumption per tree was less and bark was stripped from less than 5% of the trees. Bark damage was most common on the smaller trees, and severity of stripping was negatively correlated with tree size. Of all the trees with bark damage, 22% of the P. pinaster and 14% of the P. radiata had more than half of the stem circumference stripped. A number of these will probably suffer both stem distortion and growth retardation, and some may die. Methods of reducing the incidence of bark damage are discussed.

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00045737
Altmetric score:
Dimensions Citation Count:

    Publication year

    1985

    Authors

    Anderson, G.W.; Hawke, M.; Moore, R.W.

    Language

    English

    Keywords

    bark, damage, forest grazing, grazing systems, pastures, pinus pinaster, pinus radiata, sheep, spacing

    Geographic

    Australia, New Zealand

Related publications