CIFOR–ICRAF publishes over 750 publications every year on agroforestry, forests and climate change, landscape restoration, rights, forest policy and much more – in multiple languages.

CIFOR–ICRAF addresses local challenges and opportunities while providing solutions to global problems for forests, landscapes, people and the planet.

We deliver actionable evidence and solutions to transform how land is used and how food is produced: conserving and restoring ecosystems, responding to the global climate, malnutrition, biodiversity and desertification crises. In short, improving people’s lives.

Managing soil organic carbon in grazing lands and its potential role in climate change mitigation in Africa

Export citation

Grazing lands contain large amount of soil organic carbon (SOC) making them important to mitigate climate change, improve water infiltration and storage, improve nutrient cycling, increase land productivity and increase below and potentially above ground biodiversity, hence improving livelihoods. The key determinants of SOC sequestration potential in grazing lands in SSA are climate (rainfall amount and regime) and soil type. In general, it can be said that (i) mesic environments sustained grazing pressure is likely to lead to land degradation (and therefore may cause SOC to decrease) and 2) in dry areas with high rainfall variability, land degradation from sustained grazing may not be as apparent as grazing effects are overridden by rainfall effects. We found no significant differences in SOC following two decades of annual prescribed burning in Burkina Faso and three decades of avoiding livestock grazing management in Ethiopia. There may be instances in which there are large social costs to SOC sequestration and by making sequestration the primary goal, a situation could arise where the social or economic burdens of the project could be greater than the climate change mitigation benefits. Therefore, we recommend that SOC sequestration for climate change mitigation should be treated as a co-benefit rather than the target of a project/ activity. Projects also need to prioritize to avoid grazing land degradation and SOC losses in dry grazing lands which have less carbon sequestration potentials. Gaps in our understanding of the determinants of SOC sequestration potential were further discussed and general recommendations for future projects and other activities addressing SOC sequestration in grazing lands highlighted.
    Publication year

    2019

    Authors

    Aynekulu Betemariam, E.; Milne, E.; Shepherd, K.D.

    Language

    English

    Keywords

    soil organic carbon, grazing, mitigation, climate change, land degradation, carbon sequestration, soil carbon, soil

    Geographic

    Burkina Faso

Related publications