s:1514:"%T Bridging the research-implementation gap in IUCN Red List assessments 
%A Cazalis, V. 
%A Di, Marco, M. 
%A Butchart, S.H.M. 
%A Akçakaya, H.R. 
%A González-Suárez, M. 
%A Meyer, C. 
%A Clausnitzer, V. 
%A Böhm, M. 
%A Zizka, A. 
%A Cardoso, P. 
%A Schipper, A.M. 
%A Bachman, S.P. 
%A Young, B.E. 
%A Hoffmann, M. 
%A Benítez-López, A. 
%A Lucas, P.M. 
%A Pettorelli, N. 
%A Patoine, G. 
%A Pacifici, M. 
%A Jörger-Hickfang, T. 
%A Brooks, T.M. 
%A Rondinini, C. 
%A Hill, S.L.L. 
%A Visconti, P. 
%A Santini, L. 
%X The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species is central in biodiversity conservation, but insufficient resources hamper its long-term growth, updating, and consistency. Models or automated calculations can alleviate those challenges by providing standardised estimates required for assessments, or prioritising species for (re-)assessments. However, while numerous scientific papers have proposed such methods, few have been integrated into assessment practice, highlighting a critical research–implementation gap. We believe this gap can be bridged by fostering communication and collaboration between academic researchers and Red List practitioners, and by developing and maintaining user-friendly platforms to automate application of the methods. We propose that developing methods better encompassing Red List criteria, systems, and drivers is the next priority to support the Red List. © 2021 Elsevier Ltd 
";