CIFOR–ICRAF publishes over 750 publications every year on agroforestry, forests and climate change, landscape restoration, rights, forest policy and much more – in multiple languages.

CIFOR–ICRAF addresses local challenges and opportunities while providing solutions to global problems for forests, landscapes, people and the planet.

We deliver actionable evidence and solutions to transform how land is used and how food is produced: conserving and restoring ecosystems, responding to the global climate, malnutrition, biodiversity and desertification crises. In short, improving people’s lives.

Mid-infrared and total X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy complementarity for assessment of soil properties

Diffuse reflectance Fourier transformed mid-infrared (DRIFT-MIR) spectroscopy can predict many soil properties but extractable nutrients are often predicted poorly. This paper tested the combined DRIFT-MIR and total X-ray fluorescence (TXRF) spectroscopy analysis for prediction of soil properties related to soil fertility. A total of 700 soil samples from 44 stratified randomly located 100-km2 sentinel sites distributed across Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) were analysed for physicochemical composition using conventional reference methods, and compared with MIR and TXRF spectra using Random Forests (RF) regression algorithm and an internal out-of-bag (OOB) validation. Mid-infrared spectra resulted in good prediction models (R2 > 0.80) for organic C and total N, Mehlich-3 Ca and Al, and pH. Moderately predicted (R2 > 0.60) were extractable Mg, P sorption index, sand, silt, and clay. Models were less satisfactory (R2 < 0.60) for Mehlich-3 extractable K, Mn, Fe, Cu, B, Zn, P, S, and Na, exchangeable acidity and electrical conductivity (Ecd). Inclusion of total element concentration data from TXRF analysis in the MIR RF models significantly reduced root mean square error of prediction by 70% for Ecd, 66% for Mehlich-3 Na, 61% for Mehlich-3 S, and 50% for Mehlich-3 B due to detection by TXRF of some saline soils that were not well predicted by MIR. Overall, both methods predicted soil properties that relate to nutrient buffering capacity, including some exchangeable bases, pH, P sorption capacity, clay content, and organic matter content, and fingerprint basic soil mineralogy. Thus, further research should test whether MIR and TXRF fingerprinting could better predict soil nutrient supply capacity, as determined by crop nutrient uptake potential, than conventional soil P, K and micronutrient tests.

Dataset's Files

All Chem TXRF Data for MS3.tab
MD5: f98961f013d9782767de223bb9ec71c0

Other datasets you might be interested in