CIFOR-ICRAF berfokus pada tantangan-tantangan dan peluang lokal dalam memberikan solusi global untuk hutan, bentang alam, masyarakat, dan Bumi kita

Kami menyediakan bukti-bukti serta solusi untuk mentransformasikan bagaimana lahan dimanfaatkan dan makanan diproduksi: melindungi dan memperbaiki ekosistem, merespons iklim global, malnutrisi, keanekaragaman hayati dan krisis disertifikasi. Ringkasnya, kami berupaya untuk mendukung kehidupan yang lebih baik.

CIFOR-ICRAF menerbitkan lebih dari 750 publikasi setiap tahunnya mengenai agroforestri, hutan dan perubahan iklim, restorasi bentang alam, pemenuhan hak-hak, kebijakan hutan dan masih banyak lagi – juga tersedia dalam berbagai bahasa..

CIFOR-ICRAF berfokus pada tantangan-tantangan dan peluang lokal dalam memberikan solusi global untuk hutan, bentang alam, masyarakat, dan Bumi kita

Kami menyediakan bukti-bukti serta solusi untuk mentransformasikan bagaimana lahan dimanfaatkan dan makanan diproduksi: melindungi dan memperbaiki ekosistem, merespons iklim global, malnutrisi, keanekaragaman hayati dan krisis disertifikasi. Ringkasnya, kami berupaya untuk mendukung kehidupan yang lebih baik.

CIFOR–ICRAF publishes over 750 publications every year on agroforestry, forests and climate change, landscape restoration, rights, forest policy and much more – in multiple languages.

CIFOR–ICRAF addresses local challenges and opportunities while providing solutions to global problems for forests, landscapes, people and the planet.

We deliver actionable evidence and solutions to transform how land is used and how food is produced: conserving and restoring ecosystems, responding to the global climate, malnutrition, biodiversity and desertification crises. In short, improving people’s lives.

Biodiversity and Human Livelihood Crises in the Malay Archipelago

Ekspor kutipan

The unprecedented destruction of tropical habitats is precipitating a catastrophic biodiversity crisis (e.g., Brook et al. 2003) and adversely affecting humanity through the loss of nature’s services, including climate regulation, flood protection, and crop pollination (Balmford & Bond 2005). The close link between human well-being and healthy ecosystems has recently been demonstrated by the devastating Asian tsunami, El Nino-induced fires, and ˜ the emergence of noxious zoonotic diseases (Danielsen et al. 2005; Sodhi & Brook 2006). Nevertheless, the conservation of tropical biodiversity has been difficult to achieve, as witnessed by the serious shortfall in protectedarea coverage (Rodrigues et al. 2004). Most areas with exceptionally rich but imperiled biodiversity are inhabited by rural people who are among the poorest in the world. The communities they comprise often extract natural resources from protected biodiversity-rich areas, disputing the legitimacy of protection. The apparent conflict between protection of biodiversity and development of rural livelihoods has fueled long-standing debates be tween conservation biologists and social scientists (e.g., Wilkie et al. 2006). Biologists often consider some human activities as compromising biodiversity protection, whereas some social scientists view certain biodiversityprotection efforts as infringing on the rights of local peoples and jeopardizing their livelihoods (Terborgh 2000; Brechin et al. 2003). The tropics include many postcolonial, emerging nations, where the failure of governments and their institutions to address environmental degradation and social injustices exacerbates the conflicts (Sodhi & Brook 2006)

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00541.x
Skor altmetrik:
Jumlah Kutipan Dimensi:

Publikasi terkait