CIFOR-ICRAF aborda retos y oportunidades locales y, al mismo tiempo, ofrece soluciones a los problemas globales relacionados con los bosques, los paisajes, las personas y el planeta.

Aportamos evidencia empírica y soluciones prácticas para transformar el uso de la tierra y la producción de alimentos: conservando y restaurando ecosistemas, respondiendo a las crisis globales del clima, la malnutrición, la pérdida de biodiversidad y la desertificación. En resumen, mejorando la vida de las personas.

CIFOR-ICRAF produce cada año más de 750 publicaciones sobre agroforestería, bosques y cambio climático, restauración de paisajes, derechos, políticas forestales y mucho más, y en varios idiomas. .

CIFOR-ICRAF aborda retos y oportunidades locales y, al mismo tiempo, ofrece soluciones a los problemas globales relacionados con los bosques, los paisajes, las personas y el planeta.

Aportamos evidencia empírica y soluciones prácticas para transformar el uso de la tierra y la producción de alimentos: conservando y restaurando ecosistemas, respondiendo a las crisis globales del clima, la malnutrición, la pérdida de biodiversidad y la desertificación. En resumen, mejorando la vida de las personas.

CIFOR–ICRAF publishes over 750 publications every year on agroforestry, forests and climate change, landscape restoration, rights, forest policy and much more – in multiple languages.

CIFOR–ICRAF addresses local challenges and opportunities while providing solutions to global problems for forests, landscapes, people and the planet.

We deliver actionable evidence and solutions to transform how land is used and how food is produced: conserving and restoring ecosystems, responding to the global climate, malnutrition, biodiversity and desertification crises. In short, improving people’s lives.

Biodiversity and Human Livelihood Crises in the Malay Archipelago

Exportar la cita

The unprecedented destruction of tropical habitats is precipitating a catastrophic biodiversity crisis (e.g., Brook et al. 2003) and adversely affecting humanity through the loss of nature’s services, including climate regulation, flood protection, and crop pollination (Balmford & Bond 2005). The close link between human well-being and healthy ecosystems has recently been demonstrated by the devastating Asian tsunami, El Nino-induced fires, and ˜ the emergence of noxious zoonotic diseases (Danielsen et al. 2005; Sodhi & Brook 2006). Nevertheless, the conservation of tropical biodiversity has been difficult to achieve, as witnessed by the serious shortfall in protectedarea coverage (Rodrigues et al. 2004). Most areas with exceptionally rich but imperiled biodiversity are inhabited by rural people who are among the poorest in the world. The communities they comprise often extract natural resources from protected biodiversity-rich areas, disputing the legitimacy of protection. The apparent conflict between protection of biodiversity and development of rural livelihoods has fueled long-standing debates be tween conservation biologists and social scientists (e.g., Wilkie et al. 2006). Biologists often consider some human activities as compromising biodiversity protection, whereas some social scientists view certain biodiversityprotection efforts as infringing on the rights of local peoples and jeopardizing their livelihoods (Terborgh 2000; Brechin et al. 2003). The tropics include many postcolonial, emerging nations, where the failure of governments and their institutions to address environmental degradation and social injustices exacerbates the conflicts (Sodhi & Brook 2006)

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00541.x
Puntuación Altmetric:
Dimensiones Recuento de citas:

Publicaciones relacionadas