CIFOR-ICRAF berfokus pada tantangan-tantangan dan peluang lokal dalam memberikan solusi global untuk hutan, bentang alam, masyarakat, dan Bumi kita

Kami menyediakan bukti-bukti serta solusi untuk mentransformasikan bagaimana lahan dimanfaatkan dan makanan diproduksi: melindungi dan memperbaiki ekosistem, merespons iklim global, malnutrisi, keanekaragaman hayati dan krisis disertifikasi. Ringkasnya, kami berupaya untuk mendukung kehidupan yang lebih baik.

CIFOR-ICRAF menerbitkan lebih dari 750 publikasi setiap tahunnya mengenai agroforestri, hutan dan perubahan iklim, restorasi bentang alam, pemenuhan hak-hak, kebijakan hutan dan masih banyak lagi – juga tersedia dalam berbagai bahasa..

CIFOR-ICRAF berfokus pada tantangan-tantangan dan peluang lokal dalam memberikan solusi global untuk hutan, bentang alam, masyarakat, dan Bumi kita

Kami menyediakan bukti-bukti serta solusi untuk mentransformasikan bagaimana lahan dimanfaatkan dan makanan diproduksi: melindungi dan memperbaiki ekosistem, merespons iklim global, malnutrisi, keanekaragaman hayati dan krisis disertifikasi. Ringkasnya, kami berupaya untuk mendukung kehidupan yang lebih baik.

CIFOR–ICRAF publishes over 750 publications every year on agroforestry, forests and climate change, landscape restoration, rights, forest policy and much more – in multiple languages.

CIFOR–ICRAF addresses local challenges and opportunities while providing solutions to global problems for forests, landscapes, people and the planet.

We deliver actionable evidence and solutions to transform how land is used and how food is produced: conserving and restoring ecosystems, responding to the global climate, malnutrition, biodiversity and desertification crises. In short, improving people’s lives.

Promoting rainwater harvesting eastern and southern Africa: the RELMA experience

Ekspor kutipan

Early explorers to Africa reported finding serene countryside where people, their livestock and wildlife co-existed in an almost untamed environment (Thomson, 1887; Krapf, 1860). However, with colonization of nearly all the countries in eastern and southern Africa, except Ethiopia, in th e early 1900s, pressure on land resources started to be experienced as indigenous populations were relocated to generally poorer, more fragile farmlands and grazi ng areas, and ecosystem degradation was reported (Tate, 1904; Hardinge, 1899; Herren 1987). In contrast, the land alienated for European settlements was usually had the highest potential. For instance, in Swaziland and Zi mbabwe, more than half of the land was alienated. In Angola, Malawi, Tanzania a nd Zambia, the proportion alienated was not so large, but it still tended to be on the c ool, high-potential plat eau where productivity and population density were highest (Hunter, 1992). As a result of compulsory acquisition of high-potential land, population densities on poor quality or marginal lands throughout th e region increased over a relatively short time and traditional land management strategies became unviable. By the 1930s, soil erosion and land degradation was being documented and raising concern (Maher, 1937; 1938). During this period (1930s-1960s), the colonial administration and its extension system enforced compulsory conser vation – what has been referred to as the ‘Colonial Error in Soil Conservation’ (Admassie, 1992). From the 1960s, many African countries were getting independent from colonial rule and there were high expectations by poor smallholder farmers. In some cases, land was reallocated and large farms were sub-divided, creating new smallholder settlements, some of which spread from the wetter highlands to the drier rangelands originally used for ranching (Huber and Opondo, 1995). The incoming African settlers brought with them subsis tence agriculture even on fragile marginal lands. As the farm sizes were small, the farms were subjected to intensive cultivation and overgrazing (Koh ler 1987). The post-independence euphoria (1960s-1970s), also brought with it a laissez faire attitude among the smallholder land users, who felt “free” from co lonial rules such as those on soil and water conservation, resulting in a period of rejection, the so -called ‘lost years’ (Admassie, 1992).

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5716/WP15616.PDF
Skor altmetrik:
Jumlah Kutipan Dimensi:

Publikasi terkait