CIFOR-ICRAF berfokus pada tantangan-tantangan dan peluang lokal dalam memberikan solusi global untuk hutan, bentang alam, masyarakat, dan Bumi kita

Kami menyediakan bukti-bukti serta solusi untuk mentransformasikan bagaimana lahan dimanfaatkan dan makanan diproduksi: melindungi dan memperbaiki ekosistem, merespons iklim global, malnutrisi, keanekaragaman hayati dan krisis disertifikasi. Ringkasnya, kami berupaya untuk mendukung kehidupan yang lebih baik.

CIFOR-ICRAF menerbitkan lebih dari 750 publikasi setiap tahunnya mengenai agroforestri, hutan dan perubahan iklim, restorasi bentang alam, pemenuhan hak-hak, kebijakan hutan dan masih banyak lagi – juga tersedia dalam berbagai bahasa..

CIFOR-ICRAF berfokus pada tantangan-tantangan dan peluang lokal dalam memberikan solusi global untuk hutan, bentang alam, masyarakat, dan Bumi kita

Kami menyediakan bukti-bukti serta solusi untuk mentransformasikan bagaimana lahan dimanfaatkan dan makanan diproduksi: melindungi dan memperbaiki ekosistem, merespons iklim global, malnutrisi, keanekaragaman hayati dan krisis disertifikasi. Ringkasnya, kami berupaya untuk mendukung kehidupan yang lebih baik.

CIFOR–ICRAF publishes over 750 publications every year on agroforestry, forests and climate change, landscape restoration, rights, forest policy and much more – in multiple languages.

CIFOR–ICRAF addresses local challenges and opportunities while providing solutions to global problems for forests, landscapes, people and the planet.

We deliver actionable evidence and solutions to transform how land is used and how food is produced: conserving and restoring ecosystems, responding to the global climate, malnutrition, biodiversity and desertification crises. In short, improving people’s lives.

A comparative analysis of resource use and efficiency of ADP contact and non-contact farmers in Abia State Nigeria

Ekspor kutipan

The paper dealt on Comparative Analysis of Resource Use and Efficiency of ADP Contact and Noncontact Farmers in Abia State, Nigeria. A multistage random sampling technique was used in the selection of the Local Government Areas, blocks, circles, contact farmers and non-contact farmers in the State. The sample size was five hundred and forty (540). A well structured and pre-tested questionnaire was used for data collection. Results showed that the liner regression function gave the best-fit explaining 86.4% and 67.2% of the total variation in the value of output of contact and non-contact farmers, respectively. The result of the gross margin analysis revealed an annual net return of 171,232.4 and 91,009 for contact and non-contact farmers respectively. The results of the two groups of farmers showed that efficiency ratio in both contact non contact farmers were less than unit. The production elasticities for each of the resources used by both groups of farmers were less than unit, indicating that the relationship between these resources and output was inelastic. The sum of the parameters in both cases was less than unit, indicating decreasing returns. It was therefore recommended that output increases could be made possible by making more funds available for production given the elasticity responses of output to amount of money invested, quantity of planting material and depreciation. Inputs should be made available to the farmers at the right time and at affordable price because the farmers are responsive with use of inputs.
    Tahun publikasi

    2011

    Penulis

    Ezeh C I; Amanze J O

    Bahasa

    English

    Kata kunci

    economics

    Geografis

    Nigeria

Publikasi terkait